For the purpose of this text, we will refer to this meaning of innovation: Innovating means introducing something new and original successfully in a given context.
To succeed in this vision of innovation, two factors are indispensable:
Like any other process, innovation is adapted and developed considering contextual variables like the industry, the background team that affects the process, and even the very concept of innovation that the team has appropriated.
The innovation concept usually mentions a creativity process that ends with tangible ideas. However, the term has been mainly overused only to mention the ability to develop new ideas. This misunderstanding in practice could hinder desirable intentions, as each company defines its innovation meaning. Therefore, multiple implications for innovation interpretations exist and interact in industrial, business, and academic scenarios. Each interpretation results from the central concept considered, adapted and executed.
In simple terms, the central concept for innovation is the sum of two components: creativity + commercialisation. However, as the commercial component of the innovation process is often forgotten, good ideas that do not have commercial liability are common in entrepreneurial intentions and companies. Usually, this behaviour leads to undesirable results that force companies and entrepreneurs improvise and fail.
A common practice linking ideas with commercial liability involves constant validation points throughout the innovation process. Commonly called experimentation practices, these activities allow creators to confirm or deny the customer’s acceptance. As more experimentation activities are involved in one idea, the better the customer reception is. Consequently, a more consistent innovation process is possible if we constantly adopt ideation and experimentation activities.
Most of the time, innovation and creativity are linked as team activities rather than individual contributions. We have culturally stated that the quality of the innovation process depends mainly on teamwork, cohesion, and diversity. However, innovation results do not just rely on integrative ideas. It is the result of many variables and skills. Variables contextualise the innovation like the type of industry, team backgrounds, the life cycle of the products, etc. On the other side, team members can develop skills regarding the variables to be more efficient. Therefore, not all the methodologies and practices apply to the same context; thus, adaptation is a must when discussing innovation.
To innovate is to introduce something new and original successfully in a given context.
To innovate is to introduce something new and original successfully in a given context.
Considering that innovation requires diverse intellectual resources and the recurrence and iteration of processes, particular team coordination and alignment are mandatory to achieve common goals. Therefore, a collaborative working perspective should be privileged, providing freedom and fluidity of movement along the journey.
This section intends to clarify the notion of collaborative work in innovation and propose some elements that can facilitate it.
Some of the difficulties encountered in collaborative work are related to the coordination of the tasks and the sometimes questionable productivity of group dynamics. When we speak about collaborative work, there is a general assumption that overall efforts should be framed in a collective dynamic, believing that all team members should be called to create together permanently. Precisely, this belief misunderstands the need for a continuous dynamic between individual progress and group dynamics. All collaborative work needs input from individuals. So yes, collaboration tends to enhance the group’s capacities, as long as a particular commitment exists and each member assumes their responsibilities for the group and the project.
However, managing the skills and variables represents one of the most severe difficulties for innovation. Team leaders usually think that technical skills are more important than soft skills, but recent studies show that social skills are equal to technical skills. Effective teams focus their attention on individual periods to boost creative-thinking skills and build specific domain knowledge; then they develop periods of collaborative work where creativity and interpersonal skills take their place.
The balance between individual and collaborative work is challenging for managers. The number of moments and time in each will represent the innovation process’ adaptation. For instance, as mentioned before, teams generate ideas during collective moments, and individual work is developed to impulse creativity skills. Therefore, we should reconsider that creativity should be just an output. Creativity is simultaneously an output or a result of the collective work and an input developed during individual progress. Both constitute fundamental components of the innovation processes.
Collaborative dynamics for innovation should be structured in a combination of individual progress on activities such as gathering information, analysing data, content creation. These periods are the prelude and raw ingredients that nourish the group interactions focused on discussion, data comparison, idea generation, feedback loops, etc.
As mentioned earlier, the innovation process requires time to be adapted, developed and executed. To better understand what constitutes these three iterative steps in general, the following are a few valuable recommendations to accelerate the innovation process and, consequently, be more effective. These recommendations will help you integrate and balance the external and internal factors that influence the process.
To sum up, innovation is an iterative loop that improves itself constantly as the influences that affect it change. The more the process fits the team’s requirements, the more effective it is. It takes time to learn the best way to do it and the one that better suits the company’s requirements or the entrepreneur.
In the end, whatever the process or path to do innovation from a technical perspective, one must not lose sight of the level of commitment required in terms of collaborative work and its significant influences on the delivery of high-quality results.
With Happytivity’s approach, we help organisations develop capabilities for collaborative work from an innovation and creativity perspective. We focus on values, climate, individual and collective behaviours, processes, tools, and resources required to generate innovation.
Want to learn more about our approach?
Check our Innovation culture programme here.